Associated bacterial microbiome responds opportunistic once algal host Scenedesmus vacuolatus is attacked by endoparasite Amoeboaphelidium protococcarum | Scientific Reports – Nature.com

Associated bacterial microbiome responds opportunistic once algal host Scenedesmus vacuolatus is attacked by endoparasite Amoeboaphelidium protococcarum | Scientific Reports – Nature.com

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.
Advertisement
Scientific Reports volume 12, Article number: 13187 (2022)
Metrics details
The interactions of microalgae and their associated microbiomes have come to the fore of applied phycological research in recent years. However, the functional mechanisms of microalgal interactions remain largely unknown. Here, we examine functional protein patterns of the microalgae Scenedesmus vacuolatus and its associated bacterial community during algal infection by the endoparasite Amoeboaphelidium protococcarum. We performed metaproteomics analyses of non-infected (NI) and aphelid-infected (AI) S. vacuolatus cultures to investigate underlying functional and physiological changes under infectious conditions. We observed an increase in bacterial protein abundance as well as a severe shift of bacterial functional patterns throughout aphelid-infection in comparison to NI treatment. Most of the bacterial proteins (about 55%) upregulated in AI were linked to metabolism and transport of amino acids, lipids, coenzymes, nucleotides and carbohydrates and to energy production. Several proteins associated with pathogenic bacterial-plant interactions showed higher protein abundance levels in AI treatment. These functional shifts indicate that associated bacteria involved in commensalistic or mutualistic interactions in NI switch to opportunistic lifestyles and facilitate pathogenic or saprotrophic traits in AI treatment. In summary, the native bacterial microbiome adapted its metabolism to algal host die off and is able to metabolize nutrients from injured cells or decompose dead cellular material.
The industrial cultivation of microalgae has a wide range of academic opportunities and economic importance for various industrial sectors1,2,3. The worldwide production of fresh water microalgae is dominated by only a few species, mainly by the cyanobacterial genus Arthrospira and the green algal genus Chlorella, but also other microalgal species like Scenedesmus spp. gain increasing interest4,5. Scenedesmus species contain a diverse nutritional output and bioactive compounds with antioxidant and antimicrobial properties6. The versatility of Scenedesmus spp. is examined for human nutrition, aquaculture, bioremediation, cosmetics, pharmaceutical industries, and especially for bioenergy applications7,8,9.
However, like every other algae Scenedesmus cultures can be confronted by algal pathogens, which is a significant economic burden of microalgae production, but rarely reported1,10,11,12,13,14. The intrusion and integration of co-occurring organisms in industrial production plants are common, as sterile processing of algae cultures is economically and practically not feasible in mass production procedures15,16. Frequent biological contaminations include competitive algae and associated bacteria as well as predatory zooplankton, viruses, and parasitic fungi1,14,17. In industrial algae cultivation, algae-associated bacteria have long been regarded as mere contaminants. Bacterial contamination can indirectly compete for nutrients, or directly inactivate, attack or lyse algal cells18,19,20,21,22. However, in recent years many synergistic effects of interspecific interactions have been discovered and used in biotechnological applications12,23. The interactions of bacteria and algae are multidimensional and not only species-dependent but also affected by chemical and physical factors like temperature, nutrients, and light availability24,25. The relationship has to be therefore considered as a dynamic range of subsequent states of highly complex networks influenced by changing environmental conditions21,23,24,26,27.
Nevertheless, the metabolic level of algal interactions especially during parasitic invasion is still widely understudied. Quantitative proteomics of a B12-dependent algae grown in co-culture with bacteria on the one hand demonstrated the stability of the mutualism, but on the other hand indicated that Lobomonas rostrata experiences stress in co-culture with Mesorhizobium loti, and has to adjust its metabolism accordingly28. Proteomics analysis of the marine bacterium Marinobacter adhaerens and the diatom Thalassiosira weissflogii in co-culture suggest mutualistic interactions, depending on the release of amino acids by the diatom partner29. Furthermore, the findings of Krohn-Molt and colleagues30 imply that at least some of the triggers and signals involved in the microbial interaction with higher plants are already of relevance in algae-bacteria interactions. Plant-bacterial associations are highly diverse and involve various signaling molecules that influence host plants, which finally defines whether the outcome of the interaction is beneficial or harmful31.
The phylum Aphelidia is described as obligate endoparasites of various green algae, which pose a high threat for plant managers as they cause sudden and massive death of microalgal cells in natural environments as well as in industrial systems11,13,17. Many basic principles of aphelid infection are poorly understood, but the infection cycle of Amoeboaphelidium protococcarum has been described in detail32. After a host population is destroyed, aphelids aplanospores can remain in a dormant stadium until they come in contact with new host cells. In 2018, a global transcriptome of Paraphelidium tribonemae was employed to acknowledge the phagotrophic origin of fungi33. The results included a predicted proteome, covering full life-cycle data including cellulases, which were likely involved in algal cell-wall penetration, and enzymes involved in chitin biosynthesis, indicating typical fungal metabolism. The responses and defense reactions to pathogen infection of A. protococcarum on the green microalga Graesiella emersonii have just recently been investigated34. The defense of G. emersonii included pattern recognition receptors, large heat shock proteins, and reactive oxygen scavenging enzymes. In A. protococcarum genes for carbohydrate-active enzymes, pathogen-host interactions, putative effectors and vacuole transport including endocytosis, phagosome, ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis, and SNARE interactions, were significantly upregulated.
In previous work, we investigated the impact of infection with A. protococcarum on four algal hosts and discovered that during fungal invasion a profound shift in the composition of the associated bacterial microbiomes was observed35. The functional potential of compositional changes in the bacteria microbiome indicated an increase in hydrocarbon degradation and remediation when the algal host was attacked, but the detailed functional role of bacteria in the algae-based association remains unclear.
This work aims to further analyze the interactions of S. vacuolatus and their associated bacterial microbiome during aphelid infection by highlighting the underlying metabolic changes. Thereby, we focus on the functional patterns of co-occurring bacterial community members and compared aphelid-infected (AI) with non-infected (NI) S. vacuolatus cultures. We hypothesize that already present bacterial community members may shift their metaproteomic patterns. Since the release of algal-associated energetic compounds is expected during fungal infection, we assume that the availability of new compounds may trigger various bacterial degradation patterns. We questioned if the algal-associated bacterial community will adapt it’s metabolism and lifestyle to assure survival in the changing conditions caused by parasite infection.
Chlorophyll a fluorescence (OD685) sharply decreased 3 days post inoculation (DPI), while dry weight and algal density (OD750) only slowly decreased 5 DPI in AI treatment compared to NI treatment (Fig. 1a). However, fluorescence microscopic analyses after wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) staining showed that algal infection was high even before 4 DPI and cell death of the algal population was completed 7 DPI (Fig. 1b).
(a) Dry weight biomass content, optical density (OD750), normalized chlorophyll a fluorescence (OD685) of aphelid-infected (AI, brown) und non infected (NI, green) S. vacuolatus cultures over days post inoculation (DPI) (mean of n = 3 ± SD). (b) Mean of infection status was revealed by fluorescence microscopic observations from AI treatment over time (n = 3).
Overall, 1935 bacterial and 1786 eukaryotic Proteingroups (PGs) (1290 algal, 67 fungal and 468 various eukaryotic PGs) were observed. The taxonomic distribution of PGs differed significantly depending on presence of A. protococcarum and incubation time (Fig. 2). Proteomic patterns in NI treatment maintained similar over time and were clearly dominated by eukaryotic (~ 75%; mostly algal) and bacterial PGs (25%). In contrast, the overall number of algal and various PGs continuously decreased, while fungal PGs increased from 0.4% before infection to 3.6% mean relative abundance at 4 DPI and flattens to 2.1% at 7 DPI in AI treatment over time. Additionally, bacterial PGs steadily increased over time up to about 90% 7 DPI (Fig. 2).
Composition of protein groups (PGs) according to taxonomic affiliation to bacterial (blue) and eukaryotic (algae = dark green, fungi = green, various = light green) PGs in non-infected (NI) and aphelid-infected (AI) S. vacuolatus cultures over days post inoculation (DPI). Mean of three independent replicates per treatment and incubation time are indicated (mean of n = 3 ± SD).
The abundance of algal, fungal and bacterial PGs further underline distinct proteomic patterns between NI and AI treatment (Fig. 3). Algal PG abundances of NI treatment were similar between start 4 DPI and slightly changed 7 DPI. However, tremendous shifts in AI treatment were observed, and most algal PGs decreased in abundance. Though a small group of fungal PGs, that have very low abundance in NI treatment, exhibited high abundance in the AI treatment, especially in one replicate at 4 DPI. The course of infection was not exactly the same for all replicates at that timepoint causing this variation (Supplementary Fig. S1). In contrast, bacterial PGs showed complementary abundance patterns, if NI and AI treatment were compared (Fig. 3). Most bacterial PGs exhibited low abundances in NI and switched to high abundances in AI treatment, and vice versa. These shifts in eukaryotic and bacterial PG abundances were also found in the nonmetric dimensional scaling (NMDS), showing that PG patterns were highly treatment specific and changed severely in presence of A. protococcarum and incubation time (Fig. 4, Table 1).
Mean of relative abundances of algal, fungal and bacterial protein groups (PGs) over time. Red colors indicate higher, while green colors indicate lower protein abundances of aphelid-infected (AI) and non-infected (NI) S. vauolatus cultures 0, 4 and 7 days post inoculation (DPI). The hetamp was calculuated in the open-source platform R (v3.6.1) with the pheatmap package v1.0.12 (RRID: SCR_016418)55.The tree based on PG presence represents the clustering of euclidean PG distances.
Nonmetric dimensional scaling (NMDS) based on euclidean distances of bacterial and eucaryotic protein group (PG) abundances. S. vauolatus cultures with aphelid infection (AI, brown) and without aphelid infection (NI, green) are denoted at the start of incubation (filled circle), after 4 (filled triangle) and 7 (filled square) days post inoculation (DPI)54. Ordination stresses are indicated.
373 eukaryotic and 423 bacterial PGs were found with significant FC >  ± 1.5 between NI and AI treatment (Figs. 5 and S3). As bacterial PGs become predominant in AI treatment (Fig. 2) and their expression patterns tremendously changed (Fig. 3), we focused on the functional analyses of bacterial PGs during aphelid parasitosis while further details to eukaryotic PGs can be found in the supplementary information (Supplementary Figs. S3 and S4, Tables S1 and S2).
Volcano plot indicating differences in abundance of bacterial protein groups (PGs) between aphelid-infected (AI) and non-infected (NI) S. vauolatus cultures. PG fold changes (FCs) were calculated between AI and NI treatment after 4 days post inoculation (DPI) (light blue, left) and 7 DPI (dark blue, right)56. Log2 fold change (Log2FC) are plotted against − log10 transformed p-values to determine significantly (p > 0.05) upregulated (FC > 1.5) and downregulated (FC < − 1.5) PGs.
Main overexpressed bacterial protein groups (PGs) in AI treatment were predominantly assigned to ‘metabolism’ (55.4%), while ‘cellular processes and signalling’ accounted for 27.4% and ‘information storage and processing’ for 14.5% compared to NI treatment (Fig. 6). The functions of highly upregulated and abundant PGs were linked to metabolism and transport of amino acids, lipids, coenzymes, nucleotide and carbohydrate and energy production (Table 2). Other PGs concerning amino acids metabolism, energy production, posttranslational modifications as well as cell wall biogenesis were downregulated in AI treatment compared to NI treatment. Moreover, we found several upregulated PGs that were described to be involved in plant-bacterial interactions (Supplementary Table S2). For example, PGs from the transpeptidase-transglycosylase family, the outer membrane protein A precursor (ompA) and histidine kinases.
Functional shifts in bacterial protein groups (PGs) between aphelid-infected (AI) and non-infected (NI) S. vauolatus cultures with significantly upregulated (Fold changes (FC) > 1.5, left) and downregulated (FC < − 1.5, right) PGs. PGs were categorized into functional groups (green: metabolism; blue: transcription/translation; red: posttranslational modification, for details see figure legend) based on EggNOG database by Prophane. Relative proportions of each functional role were determined to be more (197 proteins) or less abundant (226 proteins) in AI treatment compared to NI treatment.
Since fast destruction of algae cells due to aphelid infestation has been reported repeatedly32,35,36, a rapid decline of algae in the first days after infection was expected, which was also evident in our results (Fig. 1). Additionally, substantial PG abundance changes were found in AI treatment (Figs. 2, 3 and 4). Eukaryotic PGs continuously decreased (Fig. 2) during the destruction of the algal population (Fig. 1), while fungal PGs peaked with 4 DPI and flatten until 7 DPI. The abundance of fungal PGs matches the reported reproduction cycle of A. protococcarum, which includes intrusion of host cells, phagocytosis of the host cytoplasm and maturation of spores within 3–5 DPI32,34.
In contrast, both taxonomic distribution of PGs (Fig. 2) and the PG abundance patterns (Fig. 3) revealed high stability of algal and bacterial PGs, if algal partner was cultivated in NI treatment. Minor shifts in eukaryotic PG abundance patterns over time were observed (Fig. 3) which can be explained by algal cells entering senescent stages. Algal populations in batch cultures will undergo metabolic changes by emerging nutritional limitations37,38,39, resulting in metabolic adjustments of the algae.
NI treatment was accompanied by low, but temporal stable bacterial PG patterns. The developing senescence of algae cells seems to have no substantial effect on bacterial PG abundances (Fig. 3). In contrast, we observed in AI treatment a severe increase of bacterial PG abundances over the course of aphelid infection in comparison to NI treatment (Fig. 2). Also, the bacterial functional patterns severely shifted (Fig. 3). In previous studies, we observed that S. vacuolatus had a very specific bacterial microbiome and that shifts in the composition of the associated microbiome were caused during aphelid infection35, which is in line with results of this study. Therefore, shifts in functional PG patterns (Fig. 3) were based on a change in both composition and metabolism of the indigenous microalgal-specific bacterial microbiome. We observed 423 bacterial PGs to be differently over- or underexpressed between NI and AI treatment (Fig. 5). Overall, PG abundances that were highly expressed in NI treatment such as cellular processes and signalling decreased, while metabolic PGs showed highest positive FCs in AI treatment. For example, pfpI protease was upregulated in AI treatment, facilitating the degradation of small peptides (Table 2). We also found ABC-type branched-chain amino acid transport system proteins to be upregulated, which are used for the uptake of a variety of small molecules including amino acids, metal ions, and sugars40. Furthermore, several enzymes catalysing the biosynthesis for amino acids like cysteine, leucine, arginine and pyrimidines were found. The conversion of acetate into acetyl-CoA (AcCoA) was upregulated to generate energy and biosynthetic components via the tricarboxylic acid cycle and the glyoxylate shunt, respectively (Table 2). The increase of these metabolic PGs (Fig. 6) indicates that the majority of associated bacterial community members adapted their metabolic patterns to utilize additional nutrients most likely from the algal biomass, which was released during aphelid infection. On the other hand, many PGs related to translation, transcription and posttranslational modifications were downregulated, indicating that adaptions in cellular processes and signalling were less important in AI treatment.
The increased abundance of several proteins related to bacterial pathogenic interactions with plant hosts were found (Supplementary Table S2). One example for proteins with increased PG abundance in AI treatment was the outer membrane protein A precursor (OmpA). The involvement of the OmpA gene in pathogenesis on different plants was reported for the bacterial species Ralstonia solanacearum and Xanthomonas axonopodis41,42. OmpA-mediated invasion was shown to be important in protein secretion during infection. Moreover, we found proteins from the histidine kinase family to be upregulated in AI treatment. Sensor histidine kinases were also described to be important in pathogenicity, as they were involved in a regulatory system as an essential factor for hypersensitive response and pathogenicity type III secretion system of Burkholderia glumae on rice plants43. Transpeptidase-transglycosylase was another high abundant bacterial PG in AI treatment. Multimodular transpeptidase-transglycosylase was identified as novel virulence factor of Pseudomonas savastanoi in olive knots44.
Conclusively, these results support the findings from Cirri and Pohnert26 that the relationship of microalgae and their associated microbiome is highly susceptible to changing external factors26. Healthy algal growth (NI) is characterized by stable algal–bacterial interaction patterns, but can be heavily affected by environmental disturbances like environmental stress or pathogen infections, which has been found also in other plant–microbe consortia 45,46. We observed that the bacterial community associated to S. vacuolatus was involved in commensal or mutualistic interactions with microalgae without aphelid infection (NI) and that it becomes opportunistic once aphelid infection (AI) occurred. The switch to a pathogenic lifestyle may be provoked by the destruction of the structural integrity of algal cells by aphelid intrusion. Algae exudates containing attractive nutrients or stress-induced effectors are set free, which caused an expression of pathogenic bacterial traits. On the other hand, injured or dead algal biomass can also be directly decomposed, which facilitated saprotrophic bacterial traits. These results highlight the critical importance of further studying the metabolome and understanding the basis of microbial interactions in algal populations to enhance the benefits of the natural microbiome in industrial microalgal cultivation. Future studies should focus on managing the associated bacterial community to enhance positive bacterial interactions prior algal infections. These studies ought to contain bacterial negative controls, which should be from researcher-assembled bacterial community composition previously isolated from the same algae host but without its host. In addition, absolute bacterial numbers should be taken into account to access not only qualitative but also quantitative shifts during algal infection.
Algal cultivation was performed in closed photobioreactors at the Competence Center Algal Biotechnology in Koethen, Germany in 2020. Algal strain S. vacuolatus SAG 211-8b was cultivated with autoclaved modified bolds basal medium47 (BBM) in bubble column reactors with 1.5 L capacity. The experiment was carried out at 23.5 °C, at a gas flow of 1.0 vvm (1% CO2) and permanent illumination at 100 μmol m2 s−1 with white LED light (380–750 nm). Bioreactors were inoculated to an optical density (OD750) of 0.2 (750 nm) under sterile conditions with 6 independent replicates, respectively. The preparation of aphelid inoculum from A. protococcarum strain AI15TR was set up as described earlier35. Shortly, cultures of S. vacuolatus, which contain a indigenous bacterial community35, were grown to mid-log phase in BBM for 5 days, diluted to a final OD750 of 0.2 in 1.4 L, infected with 100 mL A. protococcarum stock and cultivated in bubble column reactors using the same culture parameters applied in the following experiments. Seven days after infection, cultures were microscopically checked for infection status and frozen for later use. Three independent biological replicates of each algal culture were thereafter infected with 100 mL (6.6% vol./vol.) aphelid inoculum (AI), while 100 mL ddH2O was added to the additional three independent replicates as non-infected culture treatment (NI). Algal growth parameter like dry weight biomass (DW), optical density at 750 nm (OD750) and chlorophyll a fluorescence at 685 nm (OD685) were daily determined in independent triplicates. Determination of DW content was performed by filtering 5 mL culture suspension through glass microfiber filters (1.2 µm pore size)48. To determine OD750 algal suspension was measured photometrically at a wavelength of λ = 750 nm using an Infinite M200 Microplate Reader from Tecan (Tecan, Männedorf,Switzerland). On the same microplate reader OD685 was measured by excited the samples with a wavelength of 440 nm with a bandwidth of 9 nm and measured emissons at 685 nm with a bandwidth of 20 nm. OD685 was normalized by OD750 values to balance the influence of algal cell density on the results. Additionally, algal cells were stained with WGA and thereafter microscopically counted. The cell status was categorised as healthy (no signs of infection), infected (aphelid cysts and decreasing auto fluorescence) or dead (no auto fluorescence remained) (Supplementary Fig. S2). One-third (500 mL) of each algal culture was harvested by centrifugation (10.000×g for 5 min at room temperature) before, as well as on 4 and 7 DPI. Concentrated biomass for protein analysis was stored at − 80 °C until further processing.
Proteins were processed according to the workflow of Heyer and colleagues with few specific adaptions to algal biomass49. Shortly, proteins were extracted from 400 mg algae biomass by adding 1 g silica beads (0.5 mm), 700 µL liquid phenol (Carl Roth GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany) and 400 μL 2 M sucrose solution and shaken in an MM200 ball mill (Retsch GmbH, Haan, Germany) for 20 min at 30 Hz. The upper phenolic phase was transferred and precipitated with the fourfold volume of ice-cold 0.1 M methanolic ammonium acetate for 60 min at − 20 °C. The pellet was washed twice with a threefold volume of ice-cold 80% acetone and 70% ethanol, respectively, and finally resuspended in 1 mL urea buffer (7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 1% dithiothreitol). Protein concentrations were determined with Roti-Nanoquant dye (Carl Roth GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany), which is based on a modified Bradford method, according to manufacturer’s protocol. The quantity and quality of the protein extracts were checked through a 12%/4%-gradient SDS-page. The tryptic digestion was realized by filter aided sample preparation (FASP) as described earlier50. Briefly, the protein extracts (50 µL in 200 µL urea buffer) were loaded onto 10 K Omega FASP filters (Pall Corporation, NY, USA), reduced and alkylated by addition of 100 µL dithiothreitol (20 min, 56 °C, 300×g) and 100 µL iodoacetamide (20 min, RT, 300 × g, in darkness). The FASP filter was washed for 2 min with 100 µL 8 M urea and three times with 100 µL 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate. 25 μg trypsin (Serva, Heidelberg, Germany) was dissolved in 25 μL 50 mM acetic acid and diluted to an enzyme to protein ratio of approximately 1:100 with 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate buffer (pH 7.9). Finally, FASP filters were incubated with 200 µL of trypsin solution (2 h, 37 °C, 300×g) and the peptide lysates were rinsed through the filter by the addition of 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate and 50 µL ultrapure water, respectively.
Peptide lysates were dissolved in 0.1% formic acid before liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis (nanoLC-MS/MS). Peptide lysates (5 µL) were first loaded on the pre-column (µ-pre column, Acclaim PepMap, 75 µm inner diameter, 2 cm, C18, Thermo Scientific) for 5 min, at 4% mobile phase B (80% acetonitrile in nanopure water with 0.08% formic acid) and 96% mobile phase A (nanopure water with 0.1% formic acid), and then eluted from the analytical column (PepMap Acclaim C18 LC Column, 25 cm, 3 µm particle size, Thermo Scientific) over a 150 min linear gradient of mobile phase B (4–55% B).
Mass spectrometric analysis was performed on a Q Exactive HF mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientifc, Waltham, MA, USA) with a TriVersa NanoMate (Advion, Ltd., Harlow, UK) source in LC-chip coupling mode. Briefly, the mass spectrometer was set on loop count of 15 using for MS/MS scans with higher energy collision dissociation (HCD) at a normalized collision energy of 28%. MS scans were measured at a resolution of 120,000 in the scan range of 350–1600 m/z. MS ion count target was set to 3 × 106 at an injection time of 120 ms. Ions for MS/MS scans were isolated in the quadrupole with an isolation window of 1.2 Da and were measured with a resolution of 30,000 in the scan range of 200–2000 m/z. The dynamic exclusion duration was set to 45 s with a 10 ppm tolerance. Automatic gain control target was set to 2 × 105 with an injection time of 150 ms.
Proteome Discoverer (v2.5.0.400, Thermo Scientific) was used for protein identification and the MS/MS spectra acquired were searched with Sequest HT against the protein-coding bacterial sequences of the UniProt database51 (release 07/2021 for the bacterial taxa Oligoflexales, Pseudomonas, Blastomonas, Brevundimonas, Devosia, Hydrogenophaga, Methylophilus, Sphingomonas, Stenotrophomonas, Variovorax), the predicted proteome of Paraphelidium tribonemae released 11/201833 and algae proteomes of the Alga-PrAS resource (release 06/2016). Selection of these data sets is based on the findings of our previous study35. Enzyme specificity was selected as trypsin with up to two missed cleavages allowed, using 10 ppm peptide ion tolerance and 0.02 Da MS/MS tolerances. Oxidation at methionines as the variable modifications and carbamidomethylation at cysteines as the static modification were selected. Only peptides with a false discovery rate (FDR) < 1% calculated by Percolator were considered as identified52. Identified proteins were grouped by applying the strict parsimony principle, in which protein hits were reported as the minimum set that accounts for all observable peptides. Protein abundances were calculated minora feature detector implemented in Proteome Discoverer. Taxonomical and functional annotation of observed PG were retrieved using the open-source software Prophane, searching NCBI for taxonomic and EggNOG (v5.0) database for functional annotations53. Protein annotations were calculated based on the lowest common ancestor approach of 0.6 per PG.
The retrieved prophane dataset was split up into bacteria and eukaryotes according to taxonomic assignment of PGs. PGs that could neither be affiliated to bacteria nor eukaryotes on superkingdom level were excluded from the analyses. To clearly assess the taxonomic composition during the course of infection, we classified eukaryotic PGs belonging to algal and fungal phyla. PGs that could not be assigned to a single taxon, were summarized into the last group which will hereafter be named ‘various’. NMDS on relative PG abundances based on Euclidian distances were computed with the vegan package on the open-source platform R (v3.6.1) on the eukaryotic and bacterial subsets54. Statistical significance of aphelid infection and incubation time were calculated using a PERMANOVA (adonis). PG abundances were log2 transformed and median standardized with the decostand function on both subsets respectively. Heatmaps on the log2-median transformed PG abundances were calculated using the pheatmap package v1.0.12 (RRID: SCR_016418)55. Differences in protein abundance levels between NI and AI treatment (Log2-Fold Changes = FC) were calculated using the R-package limma56. Data visualisation of FCs at 4 and 7 DPI as volcano plots was realized with ggplot257. PGs with significant (p < 0.05) FC > 1.5 or < − 1.5 were extracted and proportions of functional subroles were plotted in pie charts of bacterial and eukaryotic PGs. Functional descriptions, EC numbers and Pfam accession numbers were checked for proteins that are typically associated with plant-pathogen interactions against the PHI database58.
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Wang, H., Zhang, W., Chen, L., Wang, J. & Liu, T. The contamination and control of biological pollutants in mass cultivation of microalgae. Bioresour Technol 128, 745–750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.10.158 (2013).
CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 
Borowitzka, M. Commercial-Scale Production of Microalgae for Bioproducts. In Blue Biotechnology (eds La Barre, S. & Bates, S. S.) 33–65 (Wiley, 2018).
Chapter  Google Scholar 
Larkum, A. W. D., Ross, I. L., Kruse, O. & Hankamer, B. Selection, breeding and engineering of microalgae for bioenergy and biofuel production. Trends Biotechnol. 30, 198–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2011.11.003 (2012).
CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 
Hallmann, A. & Rampelotto, P. H. Grand Challenges in Algae Biotechnology (Springer International Publishing, 2019).
Book  Google Scholar 
Araújo, R. et al. Current status of the algae production industry in Europe: An emerging sector of the blue bioeconomy. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 626389 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.626389
Article  Google Scholar 
Ishaq, A. G., Matias-Peralta, H. M. & Basri, H. Bioactive compounds from green microalgae: Scenedesmus and its potential applications—A brief review. J. Trop. Agric. Sci. 39, 1–16 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Abomohra, A.E.-F., El-Sheekh, M. & Hanelt, D. Pilot cultivation of the chlorophyte microalga Scenedesmus obliquus as a promising feedstock for biofuel. Biomass Bioenerg 64, 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.03.049 (2014).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 
Becker, W. (ed.). Handbook of Microalgal Culture: Biotechnology and Applied Phycology. Microalgae in Human and Animal Nutrition (Blackwell Science Ltd, 2004).
White, R. L. & Ryan, R. A. Long-term cultivation of algae in open-raceway ponds: Lessons from the field. Ind. Biotechnol. 11, 213–220. https://doi.org/10.1089/ind.2015.0006 (2015).
Article  Google Scholar 
Scott, S. A. et al. Biodiesel from algae: Challenges and prospects. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 21, 277–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2010.03.005 (2010).
CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 
Gachon, C. M. M., Sime-Ngando, T., Strittmatter, M., Chambouvet, A. & Kim, G. H. Algal diseases: Spotlight on a black box. Trends Plant Sci. 15, 633–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2010.08.005 (2010).
CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 
Kazamia, E., Aldridge, D. C. & Smith, A. G. Synthetic ecology: A way forward for sustainable algal biofuel production?. J. Biotechnol. 162, 163–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2012.03.022 (2012).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 
Carney, L. T. & Lane, T. W. Parasites in algae mass culture. Front. Microbiol. 5, 278. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00278 (2014).
Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 
Molina-Grima, E. et al. Pathogens and predators impacting commercial production of microalgae and cyanobacteria. Biotechnol. Adv. 55, 107884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2021.107884 (2022).
CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 
Schenk, P. M. et al. Second generation biofuels: High-efficiency microalgae for biodiesel production. BioEnerg. Res. 1, 20–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-008-9008-8 (2008).
Article  Google Scholar 
Cooper, M. B. & Smith, A. G. Exploring mutualistic interactions between microalgae and bacteria in the omics age. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 26, 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2015.07.003 (2015).
Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 
McBride, R. C. et al. Contamination management in low cost open algae ponds for biofuels production. Ind. Biotechnol. 10, 221–227. https://doi.org/10.1089/ind.2013.0036 (2014).
Article  Google Scholar 
Bratbak, G. & Thingstad, T. F. Phyotoplankton-bacteria interactions: An apparent paradox? Analysis of a model system with both competition and commensalism. Mar. Ecol. 25(1), 23–30. (1985)https://doi.org/10.3354/meps025023
Article  Google Scholar 
Fulbright, S. P., Chisholm, S. & Reardon, K. F. Growth inhibition of Nannochloropsis species by Bacillus pumilus. Algal Res. 20, 70–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2016.09.016 (2016).
Article  Google Scholar 
Paul, C. & Pohnert, G. Interactions of the algicidal bacterium Kordia algicida with diatoms: Regulated protease excretion for specific algal lysis. PLoS ONE 6, e21032. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021032 (2011).
ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 
Seyedsayamdost, M. R., Wang, R., Kolter, R. & Clardy, J. Hybrid biosynthesis of roseobacticides from algal and bacterial precursor molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 15150–15153. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja508782y (2014).
CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 
Wang, H. et al. Novel bacterial isolate from permian groundwater, capable of aggregating potential biofuel-producing microalga Nannochloropsis oceanica IMET1. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78, 1445–1453. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.06474-11 (2012).
ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 
Fuentes, J. L. et al. Impact of microalgae-bacteria interactions on the production of algal biomass and associated compounds. Mar. Drugs 14, 100. https://doi.org/10.3390/md14050100 (2016).
CAS  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 
Mayers, T. J., Bramucci, A. R., Yakimovich, K. M. & Case, R. J. A bacterial pathogen displaying temperature-enhanced virulence of the microalga Emiliania huxleyi. Front. Microbiol. 7, 892. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00892 (2016).
Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 
Piwosz, K. et al. Light and primary production shape bacterial activity and community composition of aerobic anoxygenic phototrophic cacteria in a microcosm experiment. mSphere 5, e00354-20. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSphere.00354-20 (2020).
Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 
Cirri, E. & Pohnert, G. Algae-bacteria interactions that balance the planktonic microbiome. New Phytol. 223, 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15765 (2019).
Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 
Gurung, T. B., Urabe, J. & Nakanishi, M. Regulation of the relationship between phytoplankton Scenedesmus acutus and heterotrophic bacteria by the balance of light and nutrients. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 17, 27–35. https://doi.org/10.3354/ame017027 (1999).
Article  Google Scholar 
Helliwell, K. E. et al. Quantitative proteomics of a B12 -dependent alga grown in coculture with bacteria reveals metabolic tradeoffs required for mutualism. New Phytol. 217, 599–612. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14832 (2018).
CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 
Stahl, A. & Ullrich, M. S. Proteomics analysis of the response of the marine bacterium Marinobacter adhaerens HP15 to the diatom Thalassiosira weissflogii. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 78, 65–79. https://doi.org/10.3354/ame01804 (2016).
Article  Google Scholar 
Krohn-Molt, I. et al. Insights into microalga and bacteria interactions of selected phycosphere biofilms using metagenomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic approaches. Front. Microbiol. 8, 1941. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01941 (2017).
Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 
Jain, A., Singh, H. B. & Das, S. Deciphering plant-microbe crosstalk through proteomics studies. Microbiol. Res. 242, 126590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2020.126590 (2021).
CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 
Letcher, P. M. et al. Characterization of Amoeboaphelidium protococcarum, an algal parasite new to the cryptomycota isolated from an outdoor algal pond used for the production of biofuel. PLoS ONE 8, e56232. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056232 (2013).
ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 
Torruella, G. et al. Global transcriptome analysis of the aphelid Paraphelidium tribonemae supports the phagotrophic origin of fungi. Commun. Biol. 1, 231. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-018-0235-z (2018).
CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 
Ding, Y. et al. Physiological and dual transcriptional analysis of microalga Graesiella emersoniiAmoeboaphelidium protococcarum pathosystem uncovers conserved defense response and robust pathogenicity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222312847 (2021).
Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 
Höger, A.-L., Griehl, C. & Noll, M. Infection with intracellular parasite Amoeboaphelidium protococcarum induces shifts in associated bacterial communities in microalgae cultures. J. Appl. Phycol. 33, 2863–2873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-021-02542-9 (2021).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 
Ding, Y. et al. Isolation and characterization of an endoparasite from the culture of oleaginous microalga Graesiella sp. WBG-1. Algal Res. 26, 371–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2017.08.003 (2017).
Article  Google Scholar 
Longworth, J., Wu, D., Huete-Ortega, M., Wright, P. C. & Vaidyanathan, S. Proteome response of Phaeodactylum tricornutum, during lipid accumulation induced by nitrogen depletion. Algal Res. 18, 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2016.06.015 (2016).
Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 
Shang, C. et al. Proteome response of Dunaliella parva induced by nitrogen limitation. Algal Res. 23, 196–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2017.01.016 (2017).
Article  Google Scholar 
Humby, P. L., Snyder, E. C. R. & Durnford, D. G. Conditional senescence in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (Chlorophyceae). J. Phycol. 49, 389–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpy.12049 (2013).
CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 
Schneider, E. & Hunke, S. ATP-binding-cassette (ABC) transport systems: Functional and structural aspects of the ATP-hydrolyzing subunits/domains. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 22(1), 1–20 (1998).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 
Athinuwat, D. & Brooks, S. The OmpA gene of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. glycines is involved in pathogenesis of pustule disease on soybean. Curr. Microbiol. 76, 879–887. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-019-01702-y (2019).
CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 
Asolkar, T. & Ramesh, R. The involvement of the type six secretion system (T6SS) in the virulence of Ralstonia solanacearum on brinjal. 3 Biotech 10, 324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-020-02311-4 (2020).
Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 
Karki, H. S., Barphagha, I. K. & Ham, J. H. A conserved two-component regulatory system, PidS/PidR, globally regulates pigmentation and virulence-related phenotypes of Burkholderia glumae. Mol. Plant Pathol. 13, 785–794. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1364-3703.2012.00787.x (2012).
CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 
Matas, I. M., Lambertsen, L., Rodríguez-Moreno, L. & Ramos, C. Identification of novel virulence genes and metabolic pathways required for full fitness of Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi in olive (Olea europaea) knots. New phytol. 196, 1182–1196. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04357.x (2012).
CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 
Vogel, C., Bodenhausen, N., Gruissem, W. & Vorholt, J. A. The Arabidopsis leaf transcriptome reveals distinct but also overlapping responses to colonization by phyllosphere commensals and pathogen infection with impact on plant health. New Phytol. 212, 192–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14036 (2016).
CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 
Cheng, Y. T., Zhang, L. & He, S. Y. Plant-microbe interactions facing environmental challenge. Cell Host Microbe 26, 183–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2019.07.009 (2019).
CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 
Bischoff, H. W. & Bold, H. C. Phycological Studies IV: Some Soil Algae from Enchanted Rock and Related Algal Species (University of Texas Publications, 1963).
Google Scholar 
Moheimani, N. R., Borowitzka, M. A., Isdepsky, A. & Sing, S. F. Standard Methods for Measuring Growth of Algae and their Composition. In Algae for Biofuels and Energy (eds Borowitzka, M. A. & Moheimani, N. R.) 265–284 (Springer, 2013).
Chapter  Google Scholar 
Heyer, R. et al. A robust and universal metaproteomics workflow for research studies and routine diagnostics within 24 h using phenol extraction, FASP digest, and the MetaProteomeAnalyzer. Front. Microbiol. 10, 1883. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01883 (2019).
Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 
Wiśniewski, J. R., Zougman, A., Nagaraj, N. & Mann, M. Universal sample preparation method for proteome analysis. Nat. Methods 6, 359–362. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1322 (2009).
CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 
The UniProt Consortium. UniProt: The universal protein knowledgebase in 2021. Nucl. Acids Res. 49, D480–D489. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa1100 (2021).
CAS  Article  Google Scholar 
Käll, L., Canterbury, J. D., Weston, J., Noble, W. S. & MacCoss, M. J. Semi-supervised learning for peptide identification from shotgun proteomics datasets. Nat. Methods 4, 923–925. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth1113 (2007).
CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 
Schiebenhoefer, H. et al. A complete and flexible workflow for metaproteomics data analysis based on MetaProteomeAnalyzer and prophane. Nat. Protoc. 15, 3212–3239. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-020-0368-7 (2020).
CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 
Oksanen, J. et al. Vegan: Community ecology package. R package version 2.4–2. Community ecology Package, 2.5-6, 1–296 (2019).
Kolde, R. Pheatmap: Pretty Heatmaps. R package version 1.0.8. (2015).
Ritchie, M. E. et al. Limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucl. Acids Res. 43, e47. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv007 (2015).
CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 
Wickham, H. Ggplot2. Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Springer Press, 2016).
MATH  Google Scholar 
Urban, M. et al. PHI-base: The pathogen-host interactions database. Nucl. Acids Res. 48, D613–D620. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz904 (2020).
CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 
Download references
We would like to thank the Ministry of Economy and Science of Saxonia Anhalt for the financial support of this study. Also, we are very grateful to Dr. Dirk Benndorf for his professional advice and personal support for this study.
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Competence Center Algae Biotechnology, Anhalt University of Applied Sciences, Koethen, Germany
Anna-Lena Hoeger & Carola Griehl
Department of Molecular Systems Biology, Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ GmbH, Permoserstr. 15, 04318, Leipzig, Germany
Nico Jehmlich & Lydia Kipping
Institute for Bioanalysis, Coburg University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Coburg, Germany
Matthias Noll
Bayreuth Center of Ecology and Environmental Research (BayCEER), University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
Matthias Noll
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
A.L.H. designed the study, conducted laboratory work, data analysis and writing of the manuscript. N.J. and L.K. performed the metaproteomic analysis and commented on the manuscript. C.G. funded the study and commented on the manuscript. M.N. was involved in the experimental design, funding and writing of the manuscript.
Correspondence to Matthias Noll.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Reprints and Permissions
Hoeger, AL., Jehmlich, N., Kipping, L. et al. Associated bacterial microbiome responds opportunistic once algal host Scenedesmus vacuolatus is attacked by endoparasite Amoeboaphelidium protococcarum. Sci Rep 12, 13187 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17114-1
Download citation
Received: 04 April 2022
Accepted: 20 July 2022
Published: 01 August 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17114-1
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
Advertisement
Advanced search
Scientific Reports (Sci Rep) ISSN 2045-2322 (online)
© 2022 Springer Nature Limited
Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

source

About the Author

Leave a Reply

error: Konten dilindungi !!
adana eskort - eskişehir eskort - eskort mersin -

taşlı led avize